Sibyl E Wray, MD
,
Hope Neurology, Knoxville, TN, USA, Knoxville, TN
Douglas L Arnold, MD
,
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, and NeuroRx Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
Jeffrey A Cohen, MD
,
Mellen Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, Cleveland, OH
Alasdair J Coles, MD
,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Christian Confavreux, MD
,
University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, Lyon, France
Edward J Fox, MD
,
MS Clinic of Central Texas, Round Rock, TX, USA, Round Rock, TX
Hans-Peter Hartung, MD
,
Heinrich-Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany, Dusseldorf, Germany
Eva Havrdova, MD, PhD
,
Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
Krzysztof Selmaj, MD, PhD
,
Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland, Lodz, Poland
Howard L Weiner, MD
,
Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Neurologic Diseases, Boston, MA, USA, Boston, MA
Tamara A Miller, MD
,
Advanced Neurology of Colorado, Ft Collins, CO, USA, Ft Collins, CO
Cary L Twyman, MD
,
Associates in Neurology PSC, Lexington, KY, USA, Lexington, KY
Stephen L Lake, ScD
,
Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA, Cambridge, MA
David H Margolin, MD
,
Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA, Cambridge, MA
Michael A Panzara, MD
,
Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA, Cambridge, MA
Alastair Compston, MD
,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Background: Alemtuzumab showed efficacy superior to subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) among relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients in the CARE-MS I and II studies. Acyclovir prophylaxis was introduced midway through the CARE-MS trials at the recommendation of the Data Monitoring Committee due to an increase in mucocutaneous herpes infections after alemtuzumab, most often during the first post-treatment month.
Objectives: To evaluate whether prophylactic treatment with acyclovir during the first month following alemtuzumab treatment is effective in reducing the risk of herpetic infections.
Methods: CARE-MS comprised two 2-year phase 3 trials, in treatment-naïve RRMS patients (CARE-MS I) and in active RRMS patients who had experienced disease activity while on prior therapy (CARE-MS II). Patients received alemtuzumab 12 mg intravenously on 5 days at entry and on 3 days 12 months later or IFNB-1a 44 µg SC 3× weekly. After a protocol amendment in January 2009, patients received oral acyclovir 200 mg twice daily during each alemtuzumab infusion and for 28 days thereafter.
Results: During 2 years of follow up, the overall incidence of any herpetic infection was higher in the alemtuzumab 12 mg group (16.0%) than the IFNB-1a group (2.0%). The most commonly reported events in the alemtuzumab 12 mg group was oral herpes (9.2% of patients), compared with 1.5% of patients in the IFNB-1a group. During the first course of alemtuzumab 12 mg, 205/811 (25.3%) patients received prophylactic acyclovir, which reduced the incidence of herpes infections during the first month (1/205 patients; 0.5%) compared with no prophylaxis (28/606 patients; 4.6%). During the second course, 521/789 (66.0%) patients in the alemtuzumab 12 mg group received acyclovir, and the incidence of herpes infections during the first month following alemtuzumab was again lower in patients who received prophylaxis than in those who did not (4 [0.8%] vs 7 patients [2.6%], respectively).
Conclusions: Overall, these data suggest that prophylactic treatment with acyclovir for 1 month following each alemtuzumab treatment course is effective in reducing the risk of herpetic infections.