QL04
Physician Rating of Fitness-to-Drive in Multiple Sclerosis

Friday, May 29, 2015
Griffin Hall
Hannes Devos, PhD , Physical Therapy, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA
Abiodun E Akinwuntan, PhD, MPH , Administration, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA
Maud Ranchet, PhD , Physical Therapy, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA
Mark Tant, PhD , CARA, Belgian Road Safety Institute, Brussels, Belgium



Background:

In Belgium, individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are typically referred by their physician for an official fitness-to-drive assessment. The referrals usually include the physician’s judgment of the patient’s fitness-to-drive. At the assessment center, a standardized on-road assessment is administered as part of a comprehensive fitness-to-drive evaluation. The on-road assessor also makes a judgment of the patient’s fitness-to-drive after the test.

Objectives:

To determine the reliability between the physician’s judgment and that of the on-road assessor.

Methods:

Referring physicians and on-road assessors used the same three-class decision as outcome variable: (1) favorable, i.e. no substantial problems with on-road driving; (2) reserved, i.e. some concerns with on-road driving; and (3) unfavorable, i.e. serious concerns with on-road driving. The percentage agreement (po), weighted kappa (kw), and prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) between the physician's and assessor's judgment were determined using the data of 95 random individuals (mean age ± SD = 53 ± 12; 50 (55%) females). The referring physician was either a neurologist or general practitioner.

Results:

The on-road assessor found no concerns on road test in the majority of MS drivers (n = 87 (92%)). Six (6%) exhibited difficulties on the road that were of concern, and 2 (2%) were advised to discontinue driving based on the findings of the road test. The po between referring physicians and on-road assessors was 83% and the kw was 0.11 (p = 0.21). The low kw was likely the result of the uneven proportion in the three categories. The PABAK adjusted for the uneven distribution and showed a reliability coefficient of 0.76 (p < 0.0001). No differences were found in po between neurologists (83%) and general practitioners (88%, Fisher’s Exact = 0.56).

Conclusions:

In this sample of drivers with MS, physicians were most of the time accurate in their appraisal of their patients’ driving capabilities.