DMT52
Inverse Relationship between Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain Concentration and Symbol Digit Modalities Test Scores in the Sunbeam Trial of Ozanimod in RMS

Thursday, June 2, 2022
Prince George's Exhibit Hall (Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center)
Sarah Harris, PhD , Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
Giancarlo Comi, MD , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and Casa di Cura del Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Bruce A.C. Cree, MD , Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Douglas L Arnold, MD , Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, and NeuroRx Research, Montreal, QC, Canada
Lawrence Steinman, MD , Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
James K. Sheffield, MD, MBA, MS , Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
Harry Southworth, PhD , Data Clarity Consulting Ltd., Stockport, United Kingdom
Rachel Maddux, PhD , Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
Ludwig Kappos, MD , Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), Departments of Head, Spine and Neuromedicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine, and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Jeffrey A Cohen, MD , Mellen MS Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
PDF


Background: Cognitive dysfunction, including diminished cognitive processing speed (CPS), is a major source of impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). In the phase 3 SUNBEAM trial, the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 and 5 modulator ozanimod reduced plasma neurofilament light chain concentration (pNfL, a marker of neurodegeneration) and improved CPS based on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) compared with intramuscular interferon (IFN) β-1a.

Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated relationships between pNfL concentration and SDMT scores at baseline and on ozanimod treatment in SUNBEAM.

Methods: In the double-blind, double-dummy SUNBEAM trial (NCT02294058), patients with relapsing MS were randomized to once-daily oral ozanimod 0.92 or 0.46 mg or weekly intramuscular IFN β-1a 30 µg, continued for ≥12 months. pNfL (analyzed with Simoa technology) and SDMT (part of a secondary endpoint) were assessed at baseline and month 12. Relationships between pNfL and SDMT at baseline were evaluated with Kendall’s τ correlation, and changes on treatment were evaluated with linear regression and treatment-stratified bootstrap sampling.

Results: SUNBEAM included 1346 patients (mean [SD] age 35.6 [9.3] y; time since symptom onset 7.0 [6.2] y; Expanded Disability Status Scale 2.6 [1.1]): 447 received ozanimod 0.92 mg, 451 ozanimod 0.46 mg, and 448 IFN β-1a. At baseline, median (IQR) pNfL was 14.7 (10.2, 23.3) pg/mL and SDMT score was 48.0 (38.0, 56.0); Kendall’s correlation (95% CI) between these variables was -0.10 (-0.14 to -0.06), indicating a slight negative association. Based on 1000 bootstrap samples, greater median percent reduction in pNfL was associated with greater mean SDMT change from baseline at month 12; both ozanimod doses were associated with greater median reductions in pNfL and mean improvements in SDMT than IFN β-1a, with 0.92 mg showing the greatest differences from IFN β-1a. There were no relationships noted between baseline pNfL or change from baseline at month 12 in pNfL and any specific SDMT category (worsened/stable/improved based on ≥4-point change from baseline at month 12).

Conclusions: In this exploratory, post hoc analysis of the SUNBEAM trial, baseline pNfL correlated inversely with baseline SDMT. Ozanimod treatment decreased pNfL and improved SDMT to a greater extent than IFN β-1a. Future prospective analyses are warranted to determine the clinical utility of pNfL as a marker of CPS.